RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

curionox/lifekline

Default branch main · commit b9a27a71 · scanned 6/8/2026, 11:18:08 PM

GitHub: 689 stars · 548 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface curionox/lifekline, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Refine README's initial positioning for clarity on Bazi numerology

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🔮 人生 K 线 (Life Destiny K-Line)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🔮 人生 K 线 (Life Destiny K-Line) - AI-Powered Bazi Numerology & Fortune Visualization
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    bazi, numerology, chinese-astrology, destiny-prediction, fortune-telling, ai, visualization, k-line, react, web3
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) in the repository root to clearly state the project's licensing terms.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface curionox/lifekline
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AstroGold
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AstroGold · recommended 1×
  2. Solar Fire · recommended 1×
  3. TimePassages · recommended 1×
  4. World Numerology App · recommended 1×
  5. Numerologist.com · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to visualize personal life destiny and fortune trends using traditional methods and AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AstroGold
    2. Solar Fire
    3. TimePassages
    4. World Numerology App
    5. Numerologist.com
    6. I Ching Oracle
    7. I Ching by Hermetic Systems
    8. sweph
    9. pandas
    10. matplotlib
    11. scikit-learn
    12. seaborn
    13. Day One
    14. Journey
    15. OpenAI API
    16. spaCy
    17. NLTK
    18. OpenAI's GPT models

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named curionox/lifekline. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some AI-powered tools for generating K-line charts of life's major events and predictions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Google Gemini
    4. Python
    5. Pandas
    6. Matplotlib
    7. Plotly
    8. mplfinance
    9. Google Sheets
    10. Microsoft Excel
    11. GPT for Sheets
    12. Tableau
    13. Power BI
    14. Airtable
    15. Zapier
    16. Make.com

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named curionox/lifekline. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of curionox/lifekline?
    pass
    AI did not name curionox/lifekline — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts curionox/lifekline in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named curionox/lifekline explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo curionox/lifekline solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named curionox/lifekline explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of curionox/lifekline. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/curionox/lifekline.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/curionox/lifekline)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/curionox/lifekline"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/curionox/lifekline.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

curionox/lifekline — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite