RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note

Default branch main · commit 27790cf8 · scanned 6/1/2026, 9:21:52 AM

GitHub: 867 stars · 88 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening tagline to highlight key features

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Human-editable notes with an agent that can work across your vault**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Lumina Note: A modern Markdown note-taking app with live preview, bidirectional links, and an AI assistant for building your second brain.**
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Your project's official website URL, e.g., https://luminanote.com]
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Alternatives
    
    While tools like Obsidian and Logseq offer robust note-taking, Lumina Note differentiates itself by [explain key differentiators, e.g., its integrated AI agent's capabilities across the vault, specific UI/UX choices, or unique approach to local-first data].

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Mem.ai · recommended 1×
  3. Notion · recommended 1×
  4. Craft · recommended 1×
  5. Logseq · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good desktop note-taking apps with AI assistance for building a second brain?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mem.ai
    2. Obsidian
    3. Notion
    4. Craft
    5. Logseq

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a local-first markdown note editor with live preview and bidirectional linking.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq (logseq/logseq)
    3. Typora
    4. Joplin (laurent22/joplin)
    5. Zettlr (Zettlr/Zettlr)
    6. Foam (foambubble/foam)
    7. Notable (fabiospampinato/notable)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note?
    pass
    AI named blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

blueberrycongee/Lumina-Note — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite