RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt

Default branch main · commit e7dcee75 · scanned 5/21/2026, 7:16:43 PM

GitHub: 1,303 stars · 147 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to emphasize its proxy function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This project converts the API of Anthropic's Claude model to the OpenAI Chat API format.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A lightweight proxy that seamlessly adapts Anthropic's Claude API to the OpenAI Chat API format, enabling existing ChatGPT-compatible applications to use Claude models without code changes.
  • hightopics#2
    Add functional topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    anthropic, chatgpt, claude, claude-ai, openai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    anthropic, chatgpt, claude, claude-ai, openai, api-proxy, llm-proxy, api-adapter, openai-api-compatibility
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the project's homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LiteLLM
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LiteLLM · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  3. LangChain · recommended 1×
  4. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  5. OpenRouter.ai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to use alternative large language models while maintaining the familiar API structure?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. LiteLLM
    3. LangChain
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. OpenRouter.ai
    6. vLLM
    7. Text Generation Inference (TGI)
    8. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    9. Azure OpenAI Service

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a proxy to adapt an existing application's AI chat API calls to a different provider.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Proxy
    2. LiteLLM
    3. BlindAI
    4. Apache APISIX
    5. Kong Gateway
    6. Nginx

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt?
    pass
    AI did not name jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

jtsang4/claude-to-chatgpt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite