RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

SawyerHood/tlbrowse

Default branch main · commit 77261238 · scanned 6/11/2026, 7:32:08 AM

GitHub: 628 stars · 119 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface SawyerHood/tlbrowse, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state its generative AI design purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    tlbrowse is an infinite canvas for the simulated web. You can create webpages by entering urls and clicking on links creates new pages. You should get incredibly funky with what imagine.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    tlbrowse is an infinite canvas for visually brainstorming and exploring AI-generated web design concepts. It allows you to create imagined webpages by entering URLs, then interactively build out entire sitemaps by clicking on links to generate new pages.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., LICENSE.md) in the repository root with a standard open-source license like MIT.
  • lowtopics#3
    Refine repository topics for better specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, sitebuilder, tldraw, typescript, website
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, generative-ai, web-design, brainstorming, sitemap, typescript, website

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface SawyerHood/tlbrowse
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Miro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Miro · recommended 2×
  2. Midjourney · recommended 1×
  3. Uizard · recommended 1×
  4. Figma · recommended 1×
  5. Magician for Figma · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I visually brainstorm website ideas and sitemaps using generative AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Midjourney
    2. Uizard
    3. Figma
    4. Magician for Figma
    5. Builder.io's Figma Plugin
    6. Galileo AI
    7. DALL-E 3
    8. ChatGPT Plus
    9. Copilot Pro
    10. Miro

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named SawyerHood/tlbrowse. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there any interactive infinite canvas tools for exploring AI-generated web design concepts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Miro
    2. Figma (with FigJam)
    3. Milanote
    4. Whimsical
    5. Excalidraw (excalidraw/excalidraw)
    6. Concepts (iPad/iOS)
    7. Google Jamboard

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named SawyerHood/tlbrowse. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of SawyerHood/tlbrowse?
    pass
    AI named SawyerHood/tlbrowse explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts SawyerHood/tlbrowse in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named SawyerHood/tlbrowse explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo SawyerHood/tlbrowse solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named SawyerHood/tlbrowse explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of SawyerHood/tlbrowse. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/SawyerHood/tlbrowse.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/SawyerHood/tlbrowse)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/SawyerHood/tlbrowse"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/SawyerHood/tlbrowse.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

SawyerHood/tlbrowse — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite