RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

carlrannaberg/claudekit

Default branch main · commit f22a4f90 · scanned 6/13/2026, 7:31:43 PM

GitHub: 723 stars · 114 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface carlrannaberg/claudekit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to explicitly state it's an enhancement for Claude Code AI assistant

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # claudekit > Smart guardrails and workflow automation for Claude Code - catch errors in real-time, save checkpoints, and enhance AI coding with expert subagents
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # claudekit: The essential enhancement toolkit for Claude Code AI assistant – smart guardrails, workflow automation, and expert subagents
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.npmjs.com/package/claudekit

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface carlrannaberg/claudekit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
SonarQube
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. SonarQube · recommended 1×
  2. eslint/eslint · recommended 1×
  3. pylint-dev/pylint · recommended 1×
  4. checkstyle/checkstyle · recommended 1×
  5. rubocop/rubocop · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to add smart guardrails and real-time error detection to an AI coding assistant?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SonarQube
    2. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    3. Pylint (pylint-dev/pylint)
    4. Checkstyle (checkstyle/checkstyle)
    5. RuboCop (rubocop/rubocop)
    6. DeepSource
    7. Snyk Code
    8. CodeClimate
    9. OpenAI's Moderation API
    10. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    11. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
    12. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named carlrannaberg/claudekit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools for automated code review, spec generation, and commit suggestions in AI-assisted development.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise / GitHub Copilot Business
    2. Codeium
    3. Tabnine
    4. DeepCode AI (Snyk Code)
    5. CodiumAI
    6. GitMind
    7. Miro
    8. ChatGPT
    9. GPT-4

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named carlrannaberg/claudekit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of carlrannaberg/claudekit?
    pass
    AI named carlrannaberg/claudekit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts carlrannaberg/claudekit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named carlrannaberg/claudekit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo carlrannaberg/claudekit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named carlrannaberg/claudekit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of carlrannaberg/claudekit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/carlrannaberg/claudekit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/carlrannaberg/claudekit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/carlrannaberg/claudekit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/carlrannaberg/claudekit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

carlrannaberg/claudekit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite