RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

re50urces/Awesome-AI

Default branch main · commit 373a68fa · scanned 6/15/2026, 9:52:53 AM

GitHub: 850 stars · 171 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface re50urces/Awesome-AI, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify repo's identity as an "awesome list" in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome AI
    > A curated list of awesome things related to artificial intelligence (AI).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome AI
    > A curated **awesome list** of tools and resources related to artificial intelligence (AI).
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root. A common choice for content lists is the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0).
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics for listed tool categories

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, artificial-intelligence, assistant, awesome, awesome-list, awesome-lists, awesomeai, deep-learning, marketing, resource, resources, voice-assistant
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, artificial-intelligence, assistant, awesome, awesome-list, awesome-lists, awesomeai, deep-learning, marketing, resource, resources, voice-assistant, generative-ai, ai-tools, content-creation, writing-tools, video-tools, image-tools

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface re50urces/Awesome-AI
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Rasa Open Source
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Rasa Open Source · recommended 1×
  2. DeepPavlov · recommended 1×
  3. OpenNMT (Open Neural Machine Translation) · recommended 1×
  4. ParlAI · recommended 1×
  5. Mycroft AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best open-source platforms for building custom conversational AI assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rasa Open Source
    2. DeepPavlov
    3. OpenNMT (Open Neural Machine Translation)
    4. ParlAI
    5. Mycroft AI

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named re50urces/Awesome-AI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need AI tools to help with content generation, like writing, video, and image creation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Midjourney
    3. Stable Diffusion
    4. Descript
    5. HeyGen
    6. DALL-E 3
    7. Canva Magic Studio

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named re50urces/Awesome-AI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of re50urces/Awesome-AI?
    pass
    AI named re50urces/Awesome-AI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts re50urces/Awesome-AI in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named re50urces/Awesome-AI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo re50urces/Awesome-AI solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name re50urces/Awesome-AI — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of re50urces/Awesome-AI. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/re50urces/Awesome-AI.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/re50urces/Awesome-AI)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/re50urces/Awesome-AI"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/re50urces/Awesome-AI.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

re50urces/Awesome-AI — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite