RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks

Default branch main · commit ca8e5802 · scanned 6/5/2026, 12:41:50 PM

GitHub: 576 stars · 93 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-security, prompt-injection, ai-security, large-language-models, vulnerability-scanner, security-testing, open-source
  • highreadme#2
    Add a concise tagline under the main README heading

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ZeroLeaks

An autonomous AI security scanner that tests LLM systems for prompt injection vulnerabilities using attack techniques.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ZeroLeaks
The Open-Source AI Security Scanner for LLM Vulnerabilities

An autonomous AI security scanner that tests LLM systems for prompt injection vulnerabilities using attack techniques.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the repository's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ZeroLeaks is licensed under [Your Specific License Name(s)]. See the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Garak-LLM/Garak
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Garak-LLM/Garak · recommended 1×
  2. OWASP/owasp-llm-top-10 · recommended 1×
  3. microsoft/promptinject · recommended 1×
  4. TextAttack/TextAttack · recommended 1×
  5. NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to test large language models for prompt injection and extraction vulnerabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Garak (Garak-LLM/Garak)
    2. OWASP LLM Top 10 Project (OWASP/owasp-llm-top-10)
    3. PromptInject (microsoft/promptinject)
    4. textattack (TextAttack/TextAttack)
    5. NeMo Guardrails (NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails)
    6. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an open-source solution to simulate prompt injection attacks on my LLM application.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Garak
    2. LLM Guard
    3. PromptInject
    4. AdvBench
    5. OWASP LLM Top 10

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks?
    pass
    AI named ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ZeroLeaks/zeroleaks — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite