RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ustc-ai4science/Science-Star

Default branch main · commit 4abe1db2 · scanned 6/10/2026, 9:08:14 PM

GitHub: 748 stars · 53 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ustc-ai4science/Science-Star, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, platform, science
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    scientific-agents, ai-for-science, scientific-discovery, llm-agents, research-platform
  • highreadme#2
    Refine the README tagline to emphasize scientific research and discovery

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"><i>Build, extend, and experiment with scientific agents. One platform. Zero friction.</i></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center"><i>Build, extend, and experiment with **scientific AI agents for research and discovery**. One platform. Zero friction.</i></p>
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to a dedicated documentation site or project page for Science-Star (e.g., `https://ustc-ai4science.github.io/Science-Star/docs` or similar).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ustc-ai4science/Science-Star
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AutoGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  5. BabyAGI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build and experiment with autonomous AI agents for scientific research?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. LangChain
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. OpenAI API
    5. BabyAGI
    6. DeepMind Lab
    7. OpenAI Gym
    8. Hugging Face Transformers

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ustc-ai4science/Science-Star. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an open platform to develop and evaluate AI agents for scientific discovery, with integrated tooling.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Gym (Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium)
    2. DeepMind Lab (deepmind/lab)
    3. RLlib (ray-project/ray)
    4. PyTorch Geometric (PyG) (pytorch/geometric)
    5. DeepChem (deepchem/deepchem)
    6. Unity ML-Agents (Unity-Technologies/ml-agents)
    7. Open Catalyst Project (OCP) (Open-Catalyst/ocp)
    8. Auto-Sklearn (automl/auto-sklearn)
    9. TPOT (EpistasisLab/tpot)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named ustc-ai4science/Science-Star. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ustc-ai4science/Science-Star?
    pass
    AI named ustc-ai4science/Science-Star explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ustc-ai4science/Science-Star in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ustc-ai4science/Science-Star explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ustc-ai4science/Science-Star solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ustc-ai4science/Science-Star explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ustc-ai4science/Science-Star. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ustc-ai4science/Science-Star.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ustc-ai4science/Science-Star)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ustc-ai4science/Science-Star"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ustc-ai4science/Science-Star.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ustc-ai4science/Science-Star — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite