RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wwbin2017/bailing

Default branch main · commit 2f7dc881 · scanned 5/14/2026, 10:17:46 PM

GitHub: 1,685 stars · 296 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wwbin2017/bailing, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to explicitly highlight its modern, full-stack nature and active development

    Why:

    CURRENT
    百聆 是一个类似GPT-4o的语音对话机器人，通过ASR+LLM+TTS实现，集成DeepSeek R1等优秀大模型，接入openClaw，真正的个人语音助手，时延低至800ms，Mac等低配置也可运行，支持打断
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    百聆 (Bailing) 是一个现代、活跃的开源语音对话机器人，类似GPT-4o，通过ASR+LLM+TTS实现，集成DeepSeek R1等优秀大模型与OpenClaw工具调用能力，是真正的个人语音助手，时延低至800ms，Mac等低配置也可运行，支持打断。
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Maintainer to provide a relevant URL, e.g., project website, demo, or a dedicated GitHub Pages site for Bailing)
  • lowtopics#3
    Refine topics to emphasize 'tool-use' and 'agent' capabilities

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, asr, chatgpt, chattts, deepseek, funasr, gpt-4o, llm, openai, openclaw, tts, voice-assistant
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, asr, chatgpt, chattts, deepseek, funasr, gpt-4o, llm, openai, openclaw, tts, voice-assistant, tool-use, agent, conversational-ai, memory

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wwbin2017/bailing
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
espeak-ng/espeak-ng
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. espeak-ng/espeak-ng · recommended 2×
  2. PicoTTS · recommended 2×
  3. MycroftAI/mycroft-core · recommended 1×
  4. rhasspy/rhasspy · recommended 1×
  5. OpenVoiceOS/ovos-core · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source voice AI assistant with fast response on low-end hardware.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mycroft AI (MycroftAI/mycroft-core)
    2. Rhasspy (rhasspy/rhasspy)
    3. OpenVoiceOS (OVOS) (OpenVoiceOS/ovos-core)
    4. Mozilla DeepSpeech (mozilla/DeepSpeech)
    5. eSpeak (espeak-ng/espeak-ng)
    6. PicoTTS
    7. Vosk (alphacep/vosk-api)
    8. eSpeak (espeak-ng/espeak-ng)
    9. PicoTTS

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named wwbin2017/bailing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best frameworks for building a conversational AI with tool use and memory?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named wwbin2017/bailing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wwbin2017/bailing?
    pass
    AI named wwbin2017/bailing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wwbin2017/bailing in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wwbin2017/bailing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wwbin2017/bailing solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wwbin2017/bailing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wwbin2017/bailing. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wwbin2017/bailing.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wwbin2017/bailing)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wwbin2017/bailing"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wwbin2017/bailing.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wwbin2017/bailing — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite