RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

web-arena-x/webarena

Default branch main · commit dce04686 · scanned 6/25/2026, 4:08:29 AM

GitHub: 1,524 stars · 243 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface web-arena-x/webarena, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify its role as an AI agent evaluation environment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents
<p align="center">
    <b>WebArena is a standalone, self-hostable web environment for building autonomous agents</b>
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Evaluating Autonomous AI Agents
<p align="center">
    <b>WebArena is the canonical, self-hostable web environment and benchmark for evaluating autonomous AI agents on complex, real-world web tasks.</b>
</p>
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization as an AI agent evaluation environment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, nlp
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, llm-agent, web-agent, agent-evaluation, benchmark, web-environment, autonomous-agents
  • mediumreadme#3
    Elevate key features from the 'Update' section into a dedicated 'Key Features' section

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The 'Update on 12/5/2024' section, which starts with: '> [!IMPORTANT] This repository hosts the *canonical* implementation of WebArena to reproduce the results reported in the paper. The web navigation infrastructure has been significantly enhanced by AgentLab, introducing several key features: (1) support for parallel experiments using BrowserGym, (2) integration of popular web navigation benchmarks (e.g., VisualWebArena) within a unified framework, (3) unified leaderboard reporting, and (4) improved handling of environment edge cases. We strongly recommend using this framework for your experiments.'
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features
*   **Realistic Evaluation:** Benchmark AI agents on complex, real-world web tasks.
*   **Enhanced Infrastructure:** Leverage AgentLab's improvements for parallel experiments (BrowserGym), integrated web navigation benchmarks (e.g., VisualWebArena), and unified leaderboard reporting.
*   **Canonical Implementation:** Reproduce results from the WebArena paper with a robust, self-hostable environment.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface web-arena-x/webarena
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
puppeteer/puppeteer
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 1×
  2. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  3. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  4. cypress-io/cypress · recommended 1×
  5. Headless Chrome · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for developing and testing autonomous agents in a web browser?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    2. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    3. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    4. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
    5. Headless Chrome

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named web-arena-x/webarena. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I create a realistic testing environment for evaluating web-based AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. BrowserMob Proxy
    5. Sauce Labs
    6. BrowserStack
    7. WireMock
    8. Docker
    9. Kubernetes
    10. Docker Compose
    11. Fiddler
    12. Charles Proxy
    13. Faker

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named web-arena-x/webarena. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of web-arena-x/webarena?
    pass
    AI named web-arena-x/webarena explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts web-arena-x/webarena in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named web-arena-x/webarena explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo web-arena-x/webarena solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named web-arena-x/webarena explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of web-arena-x/webarena. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/web-arena-x/webarena.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/web-arena-x/webarena)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/web-arena-x/webarena"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/web-arena-x/webarena.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

web-arena-x/webarena — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite