RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Automattic/wordpress-mcp

Default branch trunk · commit 295b5cc8 · scanned 6/4/2026, 2:37:08 AM

GitHub: 911 stars · 134 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Automattic/wordpress-mcp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to clarify its original purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    WordPress MCP — This repository will be deprecated as stable releases of mcp-adapter become available. Please use https://github.com/WordPress/mcp-adapter for ongoing development and support.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A WordPress plugin implementing the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for AI integration. This repository is deprecated; please use https://github.com/WordPress/mcp-adapter for ongoing development and support.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    wordpress, ai, mcp, model-context-protocol, ai-integration, plugin
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section to the README, for example: `## License
This project was released under the [INSERT LICENSE NAME HERE, e.g., MIT License].`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Automattic/wordpress-mcp
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
WP REST API
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. WP REST API · recommended 1×
  2. wp-graphql/wp-graphql · recommended 1×
  3. wp-premium/advanced-custom-fields · recommended 1×
  4. airesvsg/acf-to-rest-api · recommended 1×
  5. RSS/Atom Feeds · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to expose WordPress content and functions for AI model interaction?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. WP REST API
    2. WPGraphQL (wp-graphql/wp-graphql)
    3. Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) (wp-premium/advanced-custom-fields)
    4. ACF to REST API (airesvsg/acf-to-rest-api)
    5. RSS/Atom Feeds
    6. JSON Feed plugin (pschfr/json-feed)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Automattic/wordpress-mcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a WordPress plugin to securely integrate AI applications with site data.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. WPForms
    2. Zapier
    3. Make.com
    4. Uncanny Automator
    5. Advanced Custom Fields (ACF)
    6. WPCode
    7. AI Engine
    8. WP AI Assistant

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Automattic/wordpress-mcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Automattic/wordpress-mcp?
    pass
    AI did not name Automattic/wordpress-mcp — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Automattic/wordpress-mcp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Automattic/wordpress-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Automattic/wordpress-mcp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Automattic/wordpress-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Automattic/wordpress-mcp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Automattic/wordpress-mcp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Automattic/wordpress-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Automattic/wordpress-mcp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Automattic/wordpress-mcp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Automattic/wordpress-mcp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
Automattic/wordpress-mcp — RepoGEO report