REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
opendatalab/OmniDocBench
Default branch main · commit 176a7813 · scanned 5/22/2026, 8:53:12 AM
GitHub: 1,755 stars · 173 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface opendatalab/OmniDocBench, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- mediumreadme#1Strengthen the README's opening sentence to emphasize its comprehensive evaluation role for MLLMs
Why:
CURRENTOmniDocBench is a benchmark for evaluating diverse document parsing in real-world scenarios, featuring the following characteristics:
COPY-PASTE FIXOmniDocBench is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and other document parsing models across diverse real-world scenarios, featuring:
- mediumcomparison#2Add a 'Comparison with Existing Benchmarks' section to the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX## Comparison with Existing Benchmarks OmniDocBench distinguishes itself from existing document parsing benchmarks (e.g., DocVQA, FUNSD, SROIE, RVL-CDIP, CORD) through its comprehensive and integrated scope across multiple dimensions. Specifically, it offers: - **Diverse Document Types:** Encompassing 10 document types, 5 layout types, and 5 language types across 1651 PDF pages, including academic papers, financial reports, newspapers, textbooks, and handwritten notes, providing a broader real-world evaluation context. - **Rich Annotation Information:** Providing detailed localization, recognition results (text, LaTeX, HTML), and reading order for 28 block-level and 4 span-level elements, alongside extensive page and block-level attribute tags. This level of detail surpasses many existing datasets, enabling more granular and robust model evaluation.
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- FUNSD · recommended 2×
- SROIE · recommended 2×
- RVL-CDIP · recommended 2×
- DocVQA · recommended 1×
- CORD · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat are the best benchmarks for evaluating document parsing models across diverse real-world scenarios?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- DocVQA
- FUNSD
- SROIE
- RVL-CDIP
- CORD
- IIT-CDIP
- Tobacco800
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named opendatalab/OmniDocBench. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find a comprehensive dataset with rich structural annotations for various document types?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- DocBank
- PubLayNet
- RVL-CDIP
- SROIE
- FUNSD
- XFUND
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named opendatalab/OmniDocBench. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of opendatalab/OmniDocBench?passAI named opendatalab/OmniDocBench explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts opendatalab/OmniDocBench in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named opendatalab/OmniDocBench explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo opendatalab/OmniDocBench solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named opendatalab/OmniDocBench explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of opendatalab/OmniDocBench. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/opendatalab/OmniDocBench)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/opendatalab/OmniDocBench"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
opendatalab/OmniDocBench — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite