RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU

Default branch main · commit bc168a91 · scanned 6/9/2026, 7:22:22 PM

GitHub: 576 stars · 53 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
74 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Reposition the 'About' description to emphasize the dataset

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repo contains evaluation code for the paper "MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI"
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MMMU is a massive, multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark dataset, featuring 11.5K college-level questions for evaluating expert AGI across STEM and humanities fields. This repository provides the evaluation code.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific dataset-related topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    computer-vision, deep-learning, deep-neural-networks, evaluation, foundation-models, large-language-models, large-multimodal-models, llm, llms, machine-learning, multimodal, multimodal-deep-learning, multimodal-learning, multimodality, natural-language-processing, question-answering, stem, visual-question-answering
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    computer-vision, deep-learning, deep-neural-networks, evaluation, foundation-models, large-language-models, large-multimodal-models, llm, llms, machine-learning, multimodal, multimodal-deep-learning, multimodal-learning, multimodality, natural-language-processing, question-answering, stem, visual-question-answering, benchmark-dataset, multimodal-dataset, ai-benchmark-dataset
  • lowreadme#3
    Refine README's initial paragraph to include the dataset

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repo contains the evaluation code for the paper "MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark" and "MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI"
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides the evaluation code and the massive multimodal dataset for the papers "MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark" and "MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI"

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
14%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
MME
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. MME · recommended 1×
  2. POPE · recommended 1×
  3. MathVista · recommended 1×
  4. ScienceQA · recommended 1×
  5. VQAv2 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to benchmark large multimodal models for advanced reasoning and multi-discipline understanding?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MMMU ← you
    2. MME
    3. POPE
    4. MathVista
    5. ScienceQA
    6. VQAv2
    7. GQA
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust evaluation datasets for college-level multimodal AI performance across STEM fields?
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU?
    pass
    AI named MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

MMMU-Benchmark/MMMU — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite