RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

deta/surf

Default branch main · commit 158d9b45 · scanned 5/18/2026, 10:01:45 PM

GitHub: 3,409 stars · 245 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface deta/surf, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify Deta platform association in README opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Deta Surf is an AI notebook that brings all your files and the web directly into your stream of thought.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Deta Surf is an independent, open-source AI notebook (not affiliated with Deta Cloud) that brings all your files and the web directly into your stream of thought.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Integrate 'research notes' and 'knowledge synthesis' keywords into README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    In the 'Motivation' section, after 'We want to help people think better, across all their media.', add: 'Specifically, Surf is designed for managing and synthesizing research notes from diverse sources, enabling comprehensive knowledge synthesis across all your files and web content.'
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison with alternatives' section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new top-level section to the README titled 'Comparison with Alternatives' that briefly outlines how Deta Surf differentiates itself from popular knowledge management tools like Obsidian, Logseq, or Notion AI, particularly regarding its multi-media integration, local-first data, and open AI model choice.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface deta/surf
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Dataview · recommended 1×
  3. Excalidraw · recommended 1×
  4. Text Generator Plugin · recommended 1×
  5. Notion AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage and synthesize research notes from diverse sources with AI assistance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Dataview
    3. Excalidraw
    4. Text Generator Plugin
    5. Notion AI
    6. Mem.ai
    7. Scrintal
    8. Logseq

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named deta/surf. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source desktop AI notebook supports local LLMs and organizes files and web content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. JupyterLab Desktop (jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop)
    3. Logseq (logseq/logseq)
    4. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    5. Quarto (quarto-dev/quarto-cli)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named deta/surf. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of deta/surf?
    pass
    AI named deta/surf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts deta/surf in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named deta/surf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo deta/surf solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named deta/surf explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of deta/surf. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/deta/surf.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/deta/surf)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/deta/surf"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/deta/surf.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

deta/surf — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite