RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action

Default branch main · commit 296ca50b · scanned 6/22/2026, 10:43:19 PM

GitHub: 738 stars · 66 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add explicit clarification to README's opening about "Deep Agents" scope

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README opening, which starts with the title and subtitle.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence immediately after the main title/subtitle in the README: "本指南专注于构建基于 LangChain / LangGraph 的高级 AI Agent,而非深度强化学习 (DRL) 技术。" (This guide focuses on building advanced AI Agents based on LangChain / LangGraph, not Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) techniques.)
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file and clarify licensing for code and content

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root for the code examples (e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0, chosen by maintainer). Additionally, explicitly state in the README that the course content is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0, linking to the license.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Enhance README's introductory section to clearly define the repo's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README opening, which primarily consists of the title, subtitle, and badges.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Expand the introductory section of the README (e.g., after the H2 and the new clarification sentence) with a short paragraph (2-3 sentences) that explicitly states this repository is a practical, hands-on guide/course for building production-grade AI Agents using the LangChain/LangGraph ecosystem, emphasizing its tutorial nature over being a framework itself.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Haystack · recommended 2×
  4. Microsoft AutoGen · recommended 1×
  5. CrewAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a comprehensive guide to build robust AI agents for real-world applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft AutoGen
    4. Haystack
    5. CrewAI
    6. OpenAI Assistants API
    7. Guidance

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best practical resources for implementing AI agents with complex reasoning capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGen
    5. OpenAI API
    6. Transformers
    7. Rasa

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action?
    pass
    AI named datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

datawhalechina/deepagents-in-action — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite