RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ricklamers/shell-ai

Default branch main · commit 9a68d1ec · scanned 6/29/2026, 4:37:43 PM

GitHub: 1,152 stars · 80 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ricklamers/shell-ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to explicitly state its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Shell-AI (`shai`) is a CLI utility that brings the power of natural language understanding to your command line. Simply input what you want to do in natural language, and `shai` will suggest single-line commands that achieve your intent. Under the hood, Shell-AI leverages the LangChain for LLM use and builds on the excellent InquirerPy for the interactive CLI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Shell-AI (`shai`) is an AI-powered shell assistant CLI that translates natural language into executable shell commands. It leverages large language models to understand your intent and suggest single-line commands, making your command line more intuitive and efficient. Under the hood, Shell-AI leverages the LangChain for LLM use and builds on the excellent InquirerPy for the interactive CLI.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    automation, cli, gpt, langchain, llm, openai, shell
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-assistant, shell-assistant, natural-language-cli, command-generator, bash-commands, zsh-commands, powershell, automation, cli, gpt, langchain, llm, openai, shell
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://pypi.org/project/shell-ai/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ricklamers/shell-ai
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Fig AI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Fig AI · recommended 1×
  2. Warp · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub Copilot for CLI · recommended 1×
  4. Aider · recommended 1×
  5. ShellGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's the best way to get AI suggestions for my bash commands?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fig AI
    2. Warp
    3. GitHub Copilot for CLI
    4. Aider
    5. ShellGPT
    6. Open Interpreter

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ricklamers/shell-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a command line tool that generates shell scripts from natural language input.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. OpenAI API
    3. Google's Gemini
    4. shell-gpt (sgpt)
    5. aicli
    6. llm (by Simon Willison)
    7. GitHub Copilot
    8. Fig
    9. Python
    10. openai (Python library)
    11. google-generativeai (Python library)
    12. ExplainShell.com

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named ricklamers/shell-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ricklamers/shell-ai?
    pass
    AI named ricklamers/shell-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ricklamers/shell-ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ricklamers/shell-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ricklamers/shell-ai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ricklamers/shell-ai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ricklamers/shell-ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ricklamers/shell-ai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ricklamers/shell-ai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ricklamers/shell-ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ricklamers/shell-ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ricklamers/shell-ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite