RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill

Default branch main · commit 1dac3f89 · scanned 6/30/2026, 9:51:54 PM

GitHub: 505 stars · 26 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and subtitle to highlight niche

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # chinese-thesis-workbench
> 以标准和证据为骨架，以四种 DOCX 交付路径为输出，把项目源码、学校模板、往届样文、文献和截图整合成可追溯、可续写、可检查的中文本科论文交付工作台。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # chinese-thesis-workbench: 软件项目毕业论文自动化工作台
> **专为软件工程/计算机科学本科毕业设计打造**：以标准和证据为骨架，以四种 DOCX 交付路径为输出，把项目源码、学校模板、往届样文、文献和截图整合成可追溯、可续写、可检查的中文本科论文交付工作台。
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the 'About' description for clarity and alignment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    本科毕业论文skill：会把你的项目的源码、数据库、截图和文献，按学校模板与样文风格，工程化地写成整合成可追溯、可续写、可审查的本科毕业论文
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一个专为软件工程/计算机科学本科毕业设计设计的论文工作台。它能将你的项目源码、数据库、截图和文献，按学校模板与样文风格，工程化地整合成可追溯、可续写、可审查的中文毕业论文。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Microsoft Word
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Microsoft Word · recommended 2×
  2. Overleaf · recommended 2×
  3. LaTeX · recommended 1×
  4. Google Docs · recommended 1×
  5. Pandoc · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I efficiently format my software project thesis to meet strict university guidelines?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LaTeX
    2. Microsoft Word
    3. Overleaf
    4. Google Docs
    5. Pandoc

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help integrate project code, figures, and references into a compliant academic paper?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Overleaf
    2. Quarto
    3. Jupyter Book
    4. R Markdown
    5. RStudio
    6. Microsoft Word
    7. Zotero
    8. Mendeley
    9. Highlight.js
    10. Authorea

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill?
    pass
    AI did not name ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ZyhSechub/chinese-thesis-workbench-skill — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite