RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers

Default branch master · commit 131bbf48 · scanned 5/19/2026, 7:17:18 AM

GitHub: 3,797 stars · 890 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description to clarify project type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Easily deploy your Telegram ChatGPT bot on Cloudflare Workers (or Vercel, Docker...).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A complete, ready-to-deploy Telegram ChatGPT bot project for Cloudflare Workers (or Vercel, Docker...), supporting multiple AI providers.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a concise project statement to the README's introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is the `ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers` project, a complete solution for deploying your own AI-powered Telegram bot.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a brief 'What this is NOT' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## What is this? (and what it's not)

This project is a complete, ready-to-deploy Telegram bot application. It is not a general-purpose AI framework like LangChain or LlamaIndex, nor is it the Cloudflare Workers platform itself. Instead, it leverages these technologies to provide a streamlined bot deployment experience.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cloudflare Workers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cloudflare Workers · recommended 1×
  2. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  3. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  4. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  5. openai/openai-python · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to easily deploy a custom AI chatbot on serverless platforms like Cloudflare Workers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloudflare Workers

    AI recommended 1 alternative but never named tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a flexible solution to integrate various large language models into a Telegram bot.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    4. OpenAI Python Library (openai/openai-python)
    5. Google AI Python SDK (google/generative-ai-python)
    6. Telegram Bot API
    7. python-telegram-bot (python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot)
    8. aiogram (aiogram/aiogram)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers?
    pass
    AI did not name tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tbxark/ChatGPT-Telegram-Workers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite