RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat

Default branch main · commit a382a3a3 · scanned 5/19/2026, 11:47:50 PM

GitHub: 1,334 stars · 66 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    LongCat-Flash is a powerful and efficient 560B parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model, featuring dynamic computation and a shortcut-connected architecture for high-performance, cost-effective inference.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://longcat.ai/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Mixtral 8x7B
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Mixtral 8x7B · recommended 2×
  2. Qwen1.5-MoE · recommended 2×
  3. DeepSeek-MoE · recommended 2×
  4. OpenHermes-2.5-Mixtral-8x7B · recommended 1×
  5. SMoE models · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best large language models with Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficient inference?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mixtral 8x7B
    2. Qwen1.5-MoE
    3. DeepSeek-MoE
    4. OpenHermes-2.5-Mixtral-8x7B
    5. SMoE models

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking highly efficient large language models with dynamic parameter activation for complex tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mixtral 8x7B
    2. MoE-LLaVA
    3. DeepSeek-MoE
    4. Qwen1.5-MoE
    5. Google's Gemini
    6. GPT-4
    7. Falcon 180B
    8. vLLM
    9. TensorRT-LLM
    10. llama.cpp
    11. Llama 3

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat?
    pass
    AI named meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite