RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

paperclipai/companies

Default branch main · commit 514503bf · scanned 6/10/2026, 6:57:37 AM

GitHub: 686 stars · 178 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface paperclipai/companies, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A catalog of ready-to-deploy AI agent companies for the Paperclip platform, offering pre-built multi-agent teams with defined roles and skills for specialized business tasks.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the MIT License text, as hinted by the `opensource.org/licenses/MIT` link in the README.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface paperclipai/companies
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AutoGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AutoGPT · recommended 2×
  2. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  3. LangChain Agents · recommended 2×
  4. Microsoft AutoGen · recommended 2×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quickly set up a multi-agent AI team for specialized business tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. CrewAI
    3. LangChain Agents
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Microsoft AutoGen
    6. Haystack

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named paperclipai/companies. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for pre-built AI agent organizations with defined roles and skill sets.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. CrewAI
    3. LangChain Agents
    4. Microsoft AutoGen
    5. SuperAGI
    6. Cognosys AI
    7. AgentGPT

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named paperclipai/companies. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of paperclipai/companies?
    pass
    AI named paperclipai/companies explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts paperclipai/companies in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named paperclipai/companies explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo paperclipai/companies solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named paperclipai/companies explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of paperclipai/companies. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/paperclipai/companies.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/paperclipai/companies)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/paperclipai/companies"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/paperclipai/companies.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

paperclipai/companies — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite