RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lynote-ai/humanize-text

Default branch main · commit 3ae2dc54 · scanned 6/1/2026, 2:18:07 PM

GitHub: 1,058 stars · 55 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lynote-ai/humanize-text, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise, benefit-driven opening statement to README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with the H1, followed by badges and then "What is Humanize-Text?".
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence immediately after the main H1: "This open-source toolkit converts AI-generated content into undetectable, human-like writing, designed to bypass Turnitin, GPTZero, and all major AI detectors."
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more explicit topics for open-source and detection bypass

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-detection, ai-humanize, ai-humanizer, ai-tools, dify, gptzero-bypass, humanize-ai, humanize-ai-text, humanize-text, humanizer, n8n, openclaw
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-detection, ai-humanize, ai-humanizer, ai-tools, dify, gptzero-bypass, humanize-ai, humanize-ai-text, humanize-text, humanizer, n8n, openclaw, open-source-ai, ai-rewriter, undetectable-ai-text, ai-detector-bypass
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to differentiate from proprietary tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., "## Why Humanize-Text? (vs. Proprietary Tools)" that explains its open-source nature and specific focus on AI detection bypass, contrasting it with general-purpose, closed-source AI writing assistants.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lynote-ai/humanize-text
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
QuillBot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  2. Jasper (formerly Jarvis) · recommended 1×
  3. Wordtune · recommended 1×
  4. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  5. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I make AI-generated content more human-like to avoid detection by AI checkers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. QuillBot
    2. Jasper (formerly Jarvis)
    3. Wordtune
    4. ChatGPT
    5. Google Gemini
    6. Claude
    7. Hemingway Editor
    8. Grammarly (Premium)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named lynote-ai/humanize-text. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an open-source solution to rewrite AI text into natural, undetectable human writing.
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lynote-ai/humanize-text?
    pass
    AI named lynote-ai/humanize-text explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lynote-ai/humanize-text in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lynote-ai/humanize-text explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lynote-ai/humanize-text solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named lynote-ai/humanize-text explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lynote-ai/humanize-text. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lynote-ai/humanize-text.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lynote-ai/humanize-text)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lynote-ai/humanize-text"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lynote-ai/humanize-text.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lynote-ai/humanize-text — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite