RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JudgmentLabs/judgeval

Default branch main · commit 06b790d3 · scanned 6/26/2026, 7:56:41 AM

GitHub: 1,036 stars · 93 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JudgmentLabs/judgeval, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to emphasize the 'stack' for continuous agent improvement.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Judgeval is an open-source Python SDK for agent improvement. It provides tracing and agent-judge evaluation for LLM-powered applications — so you can detect failures, understand what went wrong, and validate fixes against real production cases before shipping.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Judgeval is the open-source **Continuous-Improvement Stack for Agents**, providing comprehensive tracing and agent-judge evaluation. It helps you detect failures, triage root causes, and ship fixes backed by production data, ensuring your LLM-powered applications continuously improve.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics related to agent lifecycle and continuous improvement.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agentic-ai, agents, grpo, langchain, langgraph, llama-index, llm, llm-evaluation, llm-observability, open-source, openai, prompt-engineering, reinforcement-learning, rl
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, agentic-ai, agents, grpo, langchain, langgraph, llama-index, llm, llm-evaluation, llm-observability, open-source, openai, prompt-engineering, reinforcement-learning, rl, agent-lifecycle, continuous-improvement, production-llm, llm-ops, agent-monitoring
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Alternatives
    
    Judgeval differentiates itself from broader LLM frameworks and general MLOps platforms by focusing specifically on the **continuous improvement lifecycle for agents**. While tools like LangChain and LlamaIndex provide foundational agent development, and platforms like MLflow or Weights & Biases offer general experiment tracking, Judgeval provides a dedicated stack for **production-grade agent evaluation and iterative refinement** using OpenTelemetry-based tracing and prompt-based agent judges. Unlike single-purpose evaluation tools, Judgeval is designed as a composable framework for managing human judgment and validating fixes against real production data.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JudgmentLabs/judgeval
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI Evals · recommended 2×
  4. MLflow · recommended 1×
  5. Weights & Biases · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to continuously improve and evaluate LLM agent performance in production environments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. MLflow
    4. Weights & Biases
    5. Arize AI
    6. WhyLabs
    7. OpenAI Evals
    8. LangChain Evaluation
    9. Humanloop
    10. Argilla
    11. Grafana
    12. Prometheus
    13. Datadog

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named JudgmentLabs/judgeval. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for tracing LLM agent execution and evaluating their behavior with prompt-based judges?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LangSmith
    3. Phoenix
    4. W&B Prompts
    5. OpenAI Evals
    6. LlamaIndex

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named JudgmentLabs/judgeval. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JudgmentLabs/judgeval?
    pass
    AI named JudgmentLabs/judgeval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JudgmentLabs/judgeval in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JudgmentLabs/judgeval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JudgmentLabs/judgeval solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name JudgmentLabs/judgeval — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JudgmentLabs/judgeval. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JudgmentLabs/judgeval.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JudgmentLabs/judgeval)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JudgmentLabs/judgeval"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JudgmentLabs/judgeval.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JudgmentLabs/judgeval — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite