RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen

Default branch master · commit 1c187544 · scanned 5/17/2026, 7:22:41 AM

GitHub: 1,091 stars · 305 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify application domain

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Automatic formulaic alpha generation with reinforcement learning.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AlphaGen is a research framework for automatically generating novel, formulaic stock alpha factors using advanced reinforcement learning and large language models (LLMs). It provides tools for quantitative researchers to discover predictive trading signals, distinct from general-purpose ML libraries or trading platforms.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, for example, using the MIT License template.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the homepage URL to the associated KDD 2023 paper on ACM DL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3580305.3599400

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Alpaca Trade API
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Alpaca Trade API · recommended 1×
  2. QuantConnect/Lean · recommended 1×
  3. quantopian/zipline · recommended 1×
  4. pytorch/pytorch · recommended 1×
  5. tensorflow/tensorflow · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate new predictive alpha factors for stock trading strategies?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Alpaca Trade API
    2. QuantConnect (Lean) (QuantConnect/Lean)
    3. Zipline (quantopian/zipline)
    4. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    5. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    6. Keras (keras-team/keras)
    7. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
    8. Featuretools (alteryx/featuretools)
    9. LightGBM (microsoft/LightGBM)
    10. XGBoost (dmlc/xgboost)
    11. ChatGPT
    12. GPT-4

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best methods for discovering novel quantitative trading signals with AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ray RLlib
    2. Stable Baselines3
    3. OpenAI Gym
    4. Farama Gymnasium
    5. PyTorch
    6. TensorFlow
    7. CTGAN
    8. Keras
    9. PyTorch Forecasting
    10. Prophet
    11. PyTorch Geometric
    12. Deep Graph Library
    13. DoWhy
    14. EconML
    15. Hugging Face Transformers
    16. spaCy

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen?
    pass
    AI named ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ICT-FinD-Lab/alphagen — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite