RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

nolly-studio/cult-ui

Default branch main · commit a3308bad · scanned 6/26/2026, 10:13:04 PM

GitHub: 5,477 stars · 285 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nolly-studio/cult-ui, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Remove or relocate the "AI SDK AGENTS" section from the main README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## AI SDK AGENTS
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Remove the "AI SDK AGENTS" section and its content from the main README. If AI agents are a related but distinct offering, consider creating a separate repository, a dedicated link to an external site, or a less prominent "Related Projects" section at the very end of the README, clearly distinguishing it from the core UI component library.
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the "About" description to highlight core differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Components crafted for Design Engineers. Styled using Tailwind CSS, fully compatible with Shadcn, and easy to integrate—just copy and paste. MIT 🤌
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Copy-paste accessible React components for Design Engineers, styled with Tailwind CSS and fully compatible with Shadcn. Build custom design systems with ease. MIT 🤌
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a "Comparison" section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled "Comparison" or "Why Cult UI?" to the README. In this section, briefly explain how Cult UI relates to or differentiates itself from popular alternatives like Shadcn UI and Radix UI Primitives, focusing on its copy-paste methodology and design engineer focus.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface nolly-studio/cult-ui
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
shadcn/ui
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. shadcn/ui · recommended 1×
  2. Radix UI Primitives · recommended 1×
  3. Tremor · recommended 1×
  4. DaisyUI · recommended 1×
  5. Mantine · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find copy-paste accessible UI components for Next.js projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. shadcn/ui
    2. Radix UI Primitives
    3. Tremor
    4. DaisyUI
    5. Mantine
    6. Chakra UI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named nolly-studio/cult-ui. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for AI agent patterns to integrate accessibility audits or data analysis.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Axe-core
    2. Playwright
    3. Selenium
    4. Puppeteer
    5. Deque's axe DevTools
    6. Google Lighthouse
    7. Pa11y
    8. Pa11y CI
    9. Pa11y Dashboard
    10. Microsoft Accessibility Insights for Web
    11. OpenAI GPT-4
    12. Anthropic Claude
    13. Google Gemini
    14. DeepMind's AlphaFold

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named nolly-studio/cult-ui. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nolly-studio/cult-ui?
    pass
    AI did not name nolly-studio/cult-ui — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts nolly-studio/cult-ui in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named nolly-studio/cult-ui explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo nolly-studio/cult-ui solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name nolly-studio/cult-ui — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of nolly-studio/cult-ui. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/nolly-studio/cult-ui.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nolly-studio/cult-ui)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nolly-studio/cult-ui"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nolly-studio/cult-ui.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

nolly-studio/cult-ui — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite