RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent

Default branch main · commit daf6657b · scanned 6/8/2026, 11:58:18 PM

GitHub: 699 stars · 159 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add descriptive topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-prompts, ide-agent, claude, cursor, trae, prompt-engineering, developer-tools, coding-assistant, productivity, prompt-collection, ai-tools
  • highreadme#2
    Add an explicit English summary to the README for better AI categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claude/Cursor/trae AI IDE智能体提示词合集
> 🚀 这是一个包含61个专业领域智能体提示词的完整合集，专为Claude/Cursor/trae设计，涵盖从编程语言到业务分析的各个专业领域。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude/Cursor/trae AI IDE智能体提示词合集
> 🚀 这是一个包含61个专业领域智能体提示词的完整合集，专为Claude/Cursor/trae设计，涵盖从编程语言到业务分析的各个专业领域。

This repository offers a comprehensive collection of specialized prompts designed to enhance the domain knowledge and capabilities of Claude, Cursor, and trae AI IDE agents. It helps developers get more expert, task-specific advice directly within their IDE.
  • highlicense#3
    Add a standard open-source LICENSE file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license, such as MIT or Apache-2.0, to clearly define usage terms.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. Cursor · recommended 1×
  3. Codeium · recommended 1×
  4. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  5. JetBrains AI Assistant · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get more specialized AI assistant advice for specific programming tasks in my IDE?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Cursor
    3. Codeium
    4. Tabnine
    5. JetBrains AI Assistant
    6. Continue (continue-team/continue)
    7. Amazon CodeWhisperer

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find expert prompt sets to enhance my AI coding assistant's domain knowledge?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome-Prompts
    2. Prompt Engineering Guide
    3. Learn Prompting
    4. OpenAI Cookbook
    5. Awesome Prompt Engineering
    6. Anthropic
    7. Google Gemini
    8. Medium
    9. Towards Data Science

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent?
    pass
    AI named bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
bjlida/AI-IDE-Agent — RepoGEO report