RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review

Default branch main · commit 7e4d5df8 · scanned 6/7/2026, 5:33:05 AM

GitHub: 1,967 stars · 393 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Expand repository topics to clarify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    open-claw, openclaw
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    open-claw, openclaw, ai-agent-monitoring, bot-dashboard, observability, realtime-monitoring
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to counter misinterpretation of 'bot-review'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A lightweight web dashboard for viewing all your OpenClaw Bots/Agents/Models/Sessions status at a glance.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A lightweight web dashboard for real-time operational monitoring and status visualization for all your OpenClaw Bots/Agents/Models/Sessions at a glance. It provides immediate visibility into agent performance and connectivity, distinct from compliance or content review tools.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Datadog
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Datadog · recommended 1×
  2. Prometheus · recommended 1×
  3. Grafana · recommended 1×
  4. New Relic · recommended 1×
  5. Elasticsearch · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to monitor status and performance of multiple AI agents across various platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Datadog
    2. Prometheus
    3. Grafana
    4. New Relic
    5. Elasticsearch
    6. Logstash
    7. Kibana
    8. Splunk
    9. Weights & Biases
    10. MLflow

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a lightweight dashboard to visualize AI bot activity and session data locally.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    2. Dash by Plotly (plotly/dash)
    3. Panel (holoviz/panel)
    4. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    5. Flask (pallets/flask)
    6. Jinja2 (pallets/jinja)
    7. Chart.js (chartjs/Chart.js)
    8. D3.js (d3/d3)
    9. Retool

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review?
    pass
    AI did not name xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
xmanrui/OpenClaw-bot-review — RepoGEO report