RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

platonai/Browser4

Default branch main · commit 925b2d4d · scanned 5/18/2026, 9:37:15 AM

GitHub: 1,046 stars · 141 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface platonai/Browser4, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README introduction to clarify AI-first differentiation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    💖 **Browser4: a lightning-fast, coroutine-safe browser engine for your AI** 💖
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    💖 **Browser4: the lightning-fast, coroutine-safe browser engine built specifically for your AI agents.** Unlike generic browser automation tools, Browser4 provides an AI-native API and infrastructure optimized for autonomous agents, large-scale data extraction, and complex workflow automation.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include AI agent applications and scale

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-ai, agentic-browser, ai-browser, browser-agent, browser-infra, browser-use-agent
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-ai, agentic-browser, ai-browser, browser-agent, browser-infra, browser-use-agent, llm-agents, ai-workflow, headless-browser, web-scraping, large-scale-automation
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Why Browser4?' or 'Comparison' section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section (e.g., 'Why Browser4?' or 'Browser4 vs. X') to the README that explicitly outlines how Browser4 differs from and builds upon generic browser automation tools like Playwright, Puppeteer, or Selenium, emphasizing its AI-native features, performance for agents, and data extraction capabilities.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface platonai/Browser4
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  2. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 1×
  3. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  4. crummy/BeautifulSoup · recommended 1×
  5. psf/requests · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically control a browser for AI agent tasks and data extraction?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    3. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    4. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    5. requests (psf/requests)
    6. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)
    7. Browserless
    8. Splash (scrapinghub/splash)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named platonai/Browser4. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What fast, concurrent browser automation library is suitable for large-scale AI workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer
    3. Selenium
    4. Selenium Grid
    5. Cypress
    6. WebDriverIO

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named platonai/Browser4. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of platonai/Browser4?
    pass
    AI did not name platonai/Browser4 — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts platonai/Browser4 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named platonai/Browser4 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo platonai/Browser4 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named platonai/Browser4 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of platonai/Browser4. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/platonai/Browser4.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/platonai/Browser4)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/platonai/Browser4"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/platonai/Browser4.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

platonai/Browser4 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite