RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wrtnlabs/agentica

Default branch main · commit 0fe76c95 · scanned 5/10/2026, 10:31:55 PM

GitHub: 1,023 stars · 62 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wrtnlabs/agentica, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to be more explicit about its core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Agentic AI framework specialized in AI Function Calling.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Agentica is a TypeScript framework for building robust AI agents and multi-agent systems, specializing in advanced function calling and seamless integration with OpenAPI specifications.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Why Agentica?' or 'Key Differentiators' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Why Agentica?' or 'Key Differentiators' that explains how Agentica's 'compiler skills,' specific function calling protocols (TypeScript Class, Swagger/OpenAPI, MCP), and focus on robust agent development provide unique advantages compared to other AI agent frameworks.
  • mediumabout#3
    Enhance the repository description to highlight multi-agent and OpenAPI integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    TypeScript AI AI Function Calling Framework enhanced by compiler skills.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    TypeScript framework for robust AI agents and multi-agent systems, with advanced function calling, compiler skills, and OpenAPI integration.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wrtnlabs/agentica
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain.js
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain.js · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex.TS · recommended 1×
  3. TypeChat · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI SDK · recommended 1×
  5. Zod · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's a good TypeScript framework for building AI agents with robust function calling?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain.js
    2. LlamaIndex.TS
    3. TypeChat
    4. OpenAI SDK
    5. Zod
    6. io-ts
    7. Autogen.js

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wrtnlabs/agentica. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build multi-agent AI systems that integrate with existing OpenAPI specifications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. CrewAI
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack
    6. Autogen

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named wrtnlabs/agentica. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wrtnlabs/agentica?
    pass
    AI named wrtnlabs/agentica explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wrtnlabs/agentica in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wrtnlabs/agentica explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wrtnlabs/agentica solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wrtnlabs/agentica explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wrtnlabs/agentica. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wrtnlabs/agentica.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wrtnlabs/agentica)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wrtnlabs/agentica"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wrtnlabs/agentica.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wrtnlabs/agentica — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite