RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

browser-use/macOS-use

Default branch main · commit 7bb5003f · scanned 5/28/2026, 4:57:58 PM

GitHub: 1,946 stars · 194 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface browser-use/macOS-use, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to clearly differentiate for AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h2>Tell your MacBook what to do, and it's done—across ANY app.</h2>
    <br>
    macOS-use enables AI agents to interact with your Macbook [see it in action!]
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h2>Empower AI Agents to Control Your MacBook Across ANY App.</h2>
    <br>
    macOS-use provides the critical interface for large language models (LLMs) and other AI agents to seamlessly interact with and automate tasks within your macOS applications, going beyond traditional scripting.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage link to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://link.browser-use.com/discord

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface browser-use/macOS-use
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Keyboard Maestro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Keyboard Maestro · recommended 2×
  2. AppleScript · recommended 2×
  3. Automator · recommended 1×
  4. Hammerspoon · recommended 1×
  5. Raycast · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow AI agents to automate tasks across different macOS applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Keyboard Maestro
    2. AppleScript
    3. Automator
    4. Hammerspoon
    5. Raycast
    6. PyObjC/AppKit

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named browser-use/macOS-use. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enable an AI to interact with and control my Mac's graphical user interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AppleScript
    2. PyAutoGUI
    3. Keyboard Maestro
    4. Accessibility APIs
    5. OpenAI GPT-4V

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named browser-use/macOS-use. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of browser-use/macOS-use?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/macOS-use explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts browser-use/macOS-use in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/macOS-use explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo browser-use/macOS-use solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name browser-use/macOS-use — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of browser-use/macOS-use. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/macOS-use.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/macOS-use)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/macOS-use"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/macOS-use.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

browser-use/macOS-use — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
browser-use/macOS-use — RepoGEO report