RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

egoist/sitefetch

Default branch main · commit 9f570a12 · scanned 5/23/2026, 3:57:53 PM

GitHub: 1,732 stars · 161 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface egoist/sitefetch, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Emphasize sitefetch's unique value for AI data preparation in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # sitefetch

Fetch an entire site and save it as a text file (to be used with AI models).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # sitefetch

Fetch an entire site and save it as a clean, readable text file, specifically optimized for ingestion by AI models. Unlike generic web scrapers that often return raw HTML, sitefetch leverages tools like Mozilla Readability to extract only the essential content, providing high-quality, noise-free data for LLMs and other AI applications.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://sitefetch.egoist.dev

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface egoist/sitefetch
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Scrapy
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Scrapy · recommended 1×
  2. Playwright · recommended 1×
  3. Beautiful Soup · recommended 1×
  4. Requests · recommended 1×
  5. Puppeteer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically fetch an entire website's content for AI model ingestion?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Scrapy
    2. Playwright
    3. Beautiful Soup
    4. Requests
    5. Puppeteer
    6. Selenium WebDriver
    7. wget
    8. HTTrack

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named egoist/sitefetch. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's a good utility to extract specific web page sections into a clean text file?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    2. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    3. Cheerio (cheeriojs/cheerio)
    4. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)
    5. lynx
    6. wkhtmltopdf (wkhtmltopdf/wkhtmltopdf)
    7. textract (deanmalmgren/textract)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named egoist/sitefetch. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of egoist/sitefetch?
    pass
    AI named egoist/sitefetch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts egoist/sitefetch in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named egoist/sitefetch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo egoist/sitefetch solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named egoist/sitefetch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of egoist/sitefetch. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/egoist/sitefetch.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/egoist/sitefetch)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/egoist/sitefetch"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/egoist/sitefetch.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

egoist/sitefetch — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite