RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Gracker/SmartPerfetto

Default branch main · commit 54333fd6 · scanned 6/14/2026, 10:51:12 AM

GitHub: 512 stars · 92 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Gracker/SmartPerfetto, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    android-performance, perfetto, ai-analysis, performance-tuning, root-cause-analysis, generative-ai, llm, android-development
  • highabout#2
    Strengthen the repository description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    use ai analysis Performance issue with perfetto
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AI-powered platform for Android performance analysis, interpreting Perfetto traces with natural language to identify root causes and suggest optimizations.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Gracker/SmartPerfetto

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Gracker/SmartPerfetto
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Google Gemini · recommended 2×
  3. https://github.com/google/perfetto · recommended 2×
  4. Perfetto UI · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Trace · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to analyze Android performance traces and identify root causes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Perfetto UI
    2. ChatGPT
    3. Google Gemini
    4. Google Cloud Trace
    5. Datadog APM
    6. New Relic Mobile
    7. `trace_processor`
    8. `scikit-learn`
    9. `TensorFlow`
    10. `PyTorch`
    11. `Prophet`
    12. Dynatrace
    13. Sentry

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named Gracker/SmartPerfetto. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to interpret Perfetto traces with natural language for performance insights.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Perfetto UI (https://github.com/google/perfetto)
    2. perfetto.trace_processor (https://github.com/google/perfetto)
    3. NLTK (https://github.com/nltk/nltk)
    4. spaCy (https://github.com/explosion/spaCy)
    5. ChatGPT
    6. Google Gemini
    7. Claude
    8. OpenAI API
    9. Google Cloud AI Platform
    10. Azure OpenAI Service

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Gracker/SmartPerfetto. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Gracker/SmartPerfetto?
    pass
    AI named Gracker/SmartPerfetto explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Gracker/SmartPerfetto in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Gracker/SmartPerfetto explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Gracker/SmartPerfetto solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Gracker/SmartPerfetto explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Gracker/SmartPerfetto. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Gracker/SmartPerfetto.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Gracker/SmartPerfetto)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Gracker/SmartPerfetto"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Gracker/SmartPerfetto.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Gracker/SmartPerfetto — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
Gracker/SmartPerfetto — RepoGEO report