RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR

Default branch main · commit 5b64f8ac · scanned 6/17/2026, 5:42:36 AM

GitHub: 530 stars · 74 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, quantization, kv-cache, large-language-models, deep-learning, machine-learning, sglang
  • highreadme#2
    Add a concise LLM context statement to the README's opening paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OSCAR captures Q/K/V activations on a small calibration set, estimates **attention-aware K/V covariance structures** offline, and derives per-layer rotations + clipping thresholds that align KV quantization with the directions attention actually consumes. The result is **INT2 storage for the bulk of the KV cache** plus a small BF16 sink + recent window — ~7× compression of the KV-cache memory footprint vs BF16, with single-digit pp accuracy drop on GPQA for the dense reasoning models we validated.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OSCAR is a novel method for Large Language Models (LLMs) that captures Q/K/V activations on a small calibration set, estimates **attention-aware K/V covariance structures** offline, and derives per-layer rotations + clipping thresholds that align KV quantization with the directions attention actually consumes. The result is **INT2 storage for the bulk of the KV cache** plus a small BF16 sink + recent window — ~7× compression of the KV-cache memory footprint vs BF16, with single-digit pp accuracy drop on GPQA for the dense reasoning models we validated.
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file or clarify licensing in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, or add a clear statement about the project's license(s) to the README, e.g., 'This project is licensed under the MIT License.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
vLLM
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. vLLM · recommended 2×
  2. NVIDIA Transformer Engine · recommended 1×
  3. DeepSpeed-MII · recommended 1×
  4. Llama 2 · recommended 1×
  5. Falcon · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I reduce the KV cache memory footprint for large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NVIDIA Transformer Engine
    2. vLLM
    3. DeepSpeed-MII
    4. vLLM
    5. Llama 2
    6. Falcon
    7. Mistral 7B
    8. StreamingLLM
    9. Google's Draft-and-Verify
    10. Medusa
    11. Hugging Face Transformers

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective strategies for 2-bit KV cache quantization in LLMs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AWQ
    2. SmoothQuant
    3. GPTQ
    4. QLoRA
    5. NuQ
    6. NVIDIA's TensorRT-LLM
    7. PyTorch's `torch.quantization` module

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR?
    pass
    AI named FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

FutureMLS-Lab/OSCAR — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite