RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cweill/gotests

Default branch develop · commit 2a672c52 · scanned 6/23/2026, 1:26:52 PM

GitHub: 5,315 stars · 352 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
78 /100
Needs work
Category recall
2 / 2
Avg rank #2.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cweill/gotests, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to highlight unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **gotests** is a powerful Go test generator that automatically creates table-driven tests from your source code. It analyzes function and method signatures to generate comprehensive test scaffolding, saving you time and ensuring consistency across your test suite.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **gotests** is the leading standalone CLI tool for automatically generating Go test boilerplate, offering unparalleled flexibility and customizability. Unlike basic IDE features or generic snippets, `gotests` analyzes function and method signatures to create comprehensive table-driven test scaffolding, saving you time and ensuring consistency across your test suite.
  • highcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison

While IDEs like GoLand and VS Code offer built-in test generation, `gotests` provides a more powerful, configurable, and editor-agnostic solution. It focuses purely on intelligent test scaffolding, complementing testing frameworks like `testify` rather than replacing them. Its custom templating and full generics support offer flexibility often missing in integrated tools.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add GoDoc URL to the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://godoc.org/github.com/cweill/gotests

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
2 / 2
100% of queries surface cweill/gotests
Avg rank
#2.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
20%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
testify
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. testify · recommended 2×
  2. GoLand · recommended 1×
  3. VS Code Go Extension · recommended 1×
  4. Manual Snippets/Templates · recommended 1×
  5. GoLand's Built-in Test Generator · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I quickly generate Go test boilerplate for existing functions and methods?
    you: #2
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GoLand
    2. gotests (github.com/cweill/gotests) ← you
    3. VS Code Go Extension
    4. testify
    5. Manual Snippets/Templates
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools to automatically create table-driven test scaffolding for Go code?
    you: #2
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GoLand's Built-in Test Generator
    2. gotests (cweill/gotests) ← you
    3. testify
    4. ginkgo
    5. gomega
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cweill/gotests?
    pass
    AI did not name cweill/gotests — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cweill/gotests in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cweill/gotests explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cweill/gotests solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cweill/gotests explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cweill/gotests. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cweill/gotests.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cweill/gotests)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cweill/gotests"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cweill/gotests.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cweill/gotests — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite