RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

WuliRuler/AutorizePro

Default branch master · commit ec811d43 · scanned 6/14/2026, 2:17:02 AM

GitHub: 606 stars · 33 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface WuliRuler/AutorizePro, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Start the README with a clear, concise English value proposition.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    English README IS HERE followed by Chinese content.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Start the `README.md` with: `AutorizePro is an authorization enforcement detection extension for Burp Suite. By adding AI-assisted analysis, it significantly reduces the false positive rate and improves the efficiency of vulnerability detection for broken access control (IDOR) vulnerabilities.`
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Homepage: (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL, e.g., a project website, documentation, or a dedicated landing page for AutorizePro.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Create a 'Key Features' section highlighting AI-driven false positive reduction.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section titled 'Key Features' or 'Why AutorizePro?' with content like:
    `*   **AI-Assisted Analysis:** Significantly reduces false positives (from 95% to 5%) in authorization vulnerability detection, saving valuable time. Supports custom OpenAI-compatible API endpoints and local models (e.g., Ollama).`
    `*   **Burp Suite Integration:** Seamlessly integrates as an extension for efficient broken access control (IDOR) testing.`
    `*   **Automated & Efficient:** Automates the detection of authorization bypasses and privilege escalation, covering diverse interface logic.`
    `*   **Exportable Reports:** Generate HTML and CSV reports for identified vulnerabilities.`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface WuliRuler/AutorizePro
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AuthMatrix
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AuthMatrix · recommended 1×
  2. Autorize · recommended 1×
  3. Auth Analyzer · recommended 1×
  4. Access Control Testing (ACT) · recommended 1×
  5. Param Miner · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective Burp Suite plugins for detecting broken access control vulnerabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AuthMatrix
    2. Autorize
    3. Auth Analyzer
    4. Access Control Testing (ACT)
    5. Param Miner
    6. Burp-UUID-Finder
    7. Software Vulnerability Scanner (SVS)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named WuliRuler/AutorizePro. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to reduce false positives when scanning for authorization flaws in web applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OWASP ZAP
    2. Burp Suite Professional
    3. AppScan
    4. Acunetix
    5. Selenium
    6. Playwright
    7. Postman
    8. Insomnia

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named WuliRuler/AutorizePro. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of WuliRuler/AutorizePro?
    pass
    AI named WuliRuler/AutorizePro explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts WuliRuler/AutorizePro in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named WuliRuler/AutorizePro explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo WuliRuler/AutorizePro solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named WuliRuler/AutorizePro explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of WuliRuler/AutorizePro. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/WuliRuler/AutorizePro.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/WuliRuler/AutorizePro)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/WuliRuler/AutorizePro"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/WuliRuler/AutorizePro.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

WuliRuler/AutorizePro — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite