RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

WUBING2023/PaperSpine

Default branch main · commit a5d29b71 · scanned 5/31/2026, 4:57:35 PM

GitHub: 1,586 stars · 66 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface WUBING2023/PaperSpine, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's English summary to clarify purpose for AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # PaperSpine

[English](README.en.md) | [中文](README.md)

**PaperSpine 使用讲解视频（Bilibili）**

> PaperSpine 是一个面向 Codex、Claude Code 和 OpenClaw 的、以 motivation 为主线的论文与报告写作 skill suite.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # PaperSpine

PaperSpine is a motivation-driven skill suite for AI agents (Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw) focused on learning from strong academic papers, building central arguments, and rewriting manuscripts through evidence-aware blueprints, revision matrices, and LaTeX-safe audits.

[English](README.en.md) | [中文](README.md)

**PaperSpine 使用讲解视频（Bilibili）**
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-writing, ai-assistant, generative-ai, latex, research-paper, manuscript-revision, claude-code, codex, openclaw
  • mediumabout#3
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://[YOUR_PROJECT_HOMEPAGE_OR_BILIBILI_VIDEO_URL] (replace with the actual URL for a project page, documentation, or the Bilibili explanation video mentioned in the README)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface WUBING2023/PaperSpine
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. Elicit · recommended 1×
  3. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  4. Grammarly · recommended 1×
  5. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI assist me in structuring and writing academic papers effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. QuillBot
    4. Grammarly
    5. Scite.ai
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. Paperpal

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named WUBING2023/PaperSpine. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help revise academic manuscripts with evidence-aware blueprints and LaTeX compliance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Overleaf
    2. Authorea
    3. Fidus Writer
    4. Pandoc
    5. VS Code
    6. Sublime Text
    7. Git
    8. Zotero
    9. Texpad
    10. TeXstudio
    11. Manubot

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named WUBING2023/PaperSpine. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of WUBING2023/PaperSpine?
    pass
    AI named WUBING2023/PaperSpine explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts WUBING2023/PaperSpine in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named WUBING2023/PaperSpine explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo WUBING2023/PaperSpine solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named WUBING2023/PaperSpine explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of WUBING2023/PaperSpine. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/WUBING2023/PaperSpine.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/WUBING2023/PaperSpine)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/WUBING2023/PaperSpine"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/WUBING2023/PaperSpine.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

WUBING2023/PaperSpine — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite