RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

repplus/rep-chrome

Default branch main · commit fc0cea7e · scanned 6/25/2026, 7:11:30 AM

GitHub: 1,594 stars · 185 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface repplus/rep-chrome, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Update repository topics to reflect core functionality

    Why:

    CURRENT
    css, html, javascript, markdown
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    chrome-extension, http-repeater, burp-suite, security-tools, ai, devtools, web-security, penetration-testing
  • highreadme#2
    Add a descriptive tagline immediately after the H1

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # rep+
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # rep+
    Burp-style HTTP Repeater for Chrome DevTools with built‑in AI to explain requests and suggest attacks.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/rep+/dhildnnjbegaggknfkagdpnballiepfm

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface repplus/rep-chrome
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ModHeader
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ModHeader · recommended 1×
  2. Requestly · recommended 1×
  3. Developer Tools · recommended 1×
  4. Postman Interceptor · recommended 1×
  5. Postman · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily modify and resend HTTP requests directly from my browser?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ModHeader
    2. Requestly
    3. Developer Tools
    4. Postman Interceptor
    5. Postman
    6. Tampermonkey
    7. Greasemonkey

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named repplus/rep-chrome. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What browser extension helps analyze HTTP requests and suggest potential security vulnerabilities using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Burp Suite Professional
    2. ActiveScan++
    3. Backslash Powered Scanner
    4. FoxyProxy
    5. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) (zaproxy/zaproxy)
    6. Wappalyzer
    7. Shodan
    8. Snyk Advisor

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named repplus/rep-chrome. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of repplus/rep-chrome?
    pass
    AI named repplus/rep-chrome explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts repplus/rep-chrome in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named repplus/rep-chrome explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo repplus/rep-chrome solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name repplus/rep-chrome — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of repplus/rep-chrome. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/repplus/rep-chrome.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/repplus/rep-chrome)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/repplus/rep-chrome"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/repplus/rep-chrome.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

repplus/rep-chrome — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite