RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

davialabs/davia

Default branch main · commit 0ae5c75f · scanned 6/28/2026, 9:57:55 AM

GitHub: 1,645 stars · 119 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface davialabs/davia, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify Davia's role in the README's opening sentence

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Davia is an **open-source tool** designed for **AI coding agents** to generate **interactive internal documentation** for your codebase.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Davia is an **open-source documentation tool** that enables **AI coding agents** to generate **interactive, editable internal documentation** for your codebase.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Correct typo in topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-tools, documentation, documentation-generator, knowledge-base, knowledge-representation, local, open-sou, wiki, wiki-engine
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-tools, documentation, documentation-generator, knowledge-base, knowledge-representation, local, open-source, wiki, wiki-engine
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Davia vs. Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Davia vs. Alternatives
    
    | Feature                 | Davia                                     | Generic Doc Generators (Docusaurus, Sphinx) | AI Coding Assistants (Copilot Chat, OpenAI API) | PKM Tools (Obsidian, Logseq) |
    |-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
    | **Primary User**        | AI Coding Agents                          | Human Developers                            | Human Developers                                | Human Developers             |
    | **Output Format**       | Interactive, editable docs (local/IDE)    | Static HTML/Markdown                        | Code/Text Suggestions                           | Markdown/Notes               |
    | **Interactivity**       | Visualizations, Whiteboards               | Limited (static)                            | N/A                                             | Limited (linking)            |
    | **Local/Self-hostable** | Yes                                       | Yes                                         | Often Cloud-based                               | Yes                          |
    | **Purpose**             | AI-generated *internal* codebase docs     | General project documentation               | Code generation/assistance                      | Personal knowledge capture   |

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface davialabs/davia
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Chat
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  3. facebook/docusaurus · recommended 1×
  4. sphinx-doc/sphinx · recommended 1×
  5. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI coding agents generate interactive, editable documentation for my codebase?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. OpenAI API
    3. Docusaurus (facebook/docusaurus)
    4. Sphinx (sphinx-doc/sphinx)
    5. Tabnine
    6. Sourcegraph Cody
    7. Documatic.ai
    8. Swimm.io
    9. MkDocs (mkdocs/mkdocs)
    10. VitePress (vuejs/vitepress)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named davialabs/davia. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help create a local, editable knowledge base with interactive visualizations for developers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq
    3. Joplin
    4. VS Code
    5. TiddlyWiki
    6. Notion

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named davialabs/davia. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of davialabs/davia?
    pass
    AI named davialabs/davia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts davialabs/davia in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named davialabs/davia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo davialabs/davia solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named davialabs/davia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of davialabs/davia. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/davialabs/davia.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/davialabs/davia)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/davialabs/davia"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/davialabs/davia.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

davialabs/davia — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite