RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ColeMurray/background-agents

Default branch main · commit e4afdc3e · scanned 5/29/2026, 6:13:19 AM

GitHub: 1,776 stars · 270 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ColeMurray/background-agents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to emphasize AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An open-source background agents coding system inspired by Ramp's Inspect.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source system for deploying and managing AI coding agents that work in full development environments.
  • mediumabout#2
    Update the repository description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An open-source background agents coding system
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source system for deploying and managing AI coding agents in full development environments, automating tasks via webhooks, GitHub PRs, and schedules.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ColeMurray/background-agents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
gitpod-io/gitpod
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. gitpod-io/gitpod · recommended 1×
  2. coder/coder · recommended 1×
  3. devcontainers/spec · recommended 1×
  4. kubernetes/kubernetes · recommended 1×
  5. hashicorp/nomad · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I deploy an AI agent that accesses full development environments for background coding tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gitpod (gitpod-io/gitpod)
    2. Coder (coder/coder)
    3. Dev Containers (devcontainers/spec)
    4. Kubernetes (kubernetes/kubernetes)
    5. Nomad (hashicorp/nomad)
    6. Google Cloud Workstations
    7. AWS Cloud9
    8. Azure Dev Spaces
    9. Replit
    10. Docker (moby/moby)
    11. Vagrant (hashicorp/vagrant)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named ColeMurray/background-agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source systems enable AI agents to automate code changes from GitHub PRs or webhooks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenDevin (OpenDevin/OpenDevin)
    2. Auto-GPT (Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT)
    3. AgentGPT (AgentGPT/AgentGPT)
    4. LangChain Agents (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. CodiumAI
    6. Smol-Developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ColeMurray/background-agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ColeMurray/background-agents?
    pass
    AI named ColeMurray/background-agents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ColeMurray/background-agents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ColeMurray/background-agents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ColeMurray/background-agents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ColeMurray/background-agents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ColeMurray/background-agents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ColeMurray/background-agents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ColeMurray/background-agents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ColeMurray/background-agents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ColeMurray/background-agents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ColeMurray/background-agents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite