RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

trpc-group/trpc-agent-go

Default branch main · commit 34abffae · scanned 5/17/2026, 2:51:47 AM

GitHub: 1,175 stars · 133 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface trpc-group/trpc-agent-go, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify its core purpose as an AI agent framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A powerful Go framework for building intelligent agent systems that transforms how you create AI applications.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    tRPC-Agent-Go is a powerful Go framework for building intelligent agent systems using large language models (LLMs) and tools, *distinct from the core tRPC microservice framework*. It transforms how you create AI applications by enabling autonomous agents that think, remember, collaborate, and act with unprecedented ease.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics with more specific AI agent and LLM keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    a2a, agent, ai, llm, mcp
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    go, golang, llm, large-language-models, ai-agents, agent-framework, multi-agent, autonomous-agents, langchain, prompt-engineering, tool-use, memory, orchestration, graph-agent
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
    This project is licensed under [Specify License Name(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license' or 'a combination of X and Y licenses']. See the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface trpc-group/trpc-agent-go
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain Go
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain Go · recommended 2×
  2. Go-LLM · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Go Library · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud Go Client Libraries · recommended 1×
  5. Echo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Go framework for building autonomous AI agent systems using large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain Go
    2. Go-LLM
    3. OpenAI Go Library
    4. Google Cloud Go Client Libraries
    5. Echo
    6. Gin

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named trpc-group/trpc-agent-go. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for orchestrating multi-agent LLM workflows and persistent memory in Go?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain Go
    2. Temporal
    3. Cadence
    4. PostgreSQL
    5. GORM
    6. sqlx
    7. Redis
    8. Camunda Platform
    9. Apache Kafka
    10. MongoDB
    11. segmentio/kafka-go (segmentio/kafka-go)
    12. confluentinc/confluent-kafka-go (confluentinc/confluent-kafka-go)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named trpc-group/trpc-agent-go. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of trpc-group/trpc-agent-go?
    pass
    AI named trpc-group/trpc-agent-go explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts trpc-group/trpc-agent-go in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named trpc-group/trpc-agent-go explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo trpc-group/trpc-agent-go solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name trpc-group/trpc-agent-go — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of trpc-group/trpc-agent-go. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/trpc-group/trpc-agent-go.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/trpc-group/trpc-agent-go)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/trpc-group/trpc-agent-go"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/trpc-group/trpc-agent-go.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

trpc-group/trpc-agent-go — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite