RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

muxinc/stream.new

Default branch main · commit 0148f009 · scanned 6/10/2026, 9:28:41 PM

GitHub: 593 stars · 81 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface muxinc/stream.new, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0).
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The repo for https://stream.new
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source example web application for recording and uploading videos using Mux.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    hacktoberfest, mux, streaming-video, video
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    hacktoberfest, mux, streaming-video, video, example-app, web-application, video-recording, video-upload, demo

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface muxinc/stream.new
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Mux Video
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Mux Video · recommended 1×
  2. Cloudinary · recommended 1×
  3. Uploadcare · recommended 1×
  4. Vimeo API · recommended 1×
  5. Vimeo OTT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily implement video recording and uploading features in my web application?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mux Video
    2. Cloudinary
    3. Uploadcare
    4. Vimeo API
    5. Vimeo OTT
    6. Vimeo Live
    7. AWS Elemental Media Services
    8. AWS Elemental MediaLive
    9. Amazon S3
    10. Amazon CloudFront
    11. Twilio Video
    12. Ziggeo

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named muxinc/stream.new. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source example to build a simple video streaming and upload service.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Node.js
    2. Express.js
    3. FFmpeg
    4. Flask
    5. Laravel
    6. Nginx
    7. nginx-rtmp-module
    8. Strapi
    9. MediaGoblin
    10. Owncast

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named muxinc/stream.new. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of muxinc/stream.new?
    pass
    AI did not name muxinc/stream.new — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts muxinc/stream.new in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named muxinc/stream.new explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo muxinc/stream.new solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named muxinc/stream.new explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of muxinc/stream.new. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/muxinc/stream.new.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/muxinc/stream.new)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/muxinc/stream.new"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/muxinc/stream.new.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

muxinc/stream.new — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite