RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

leoning60/browsernode

Default branch main · commit ca0ba887 · scanned 5/15/2026, 1:52:51 AM

GitHub: 1,050 stars · 111 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface leoning60/browsernode, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear, concise value proposition for AI agents in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    🌐 Browsernode is the easiest way to connect your AI agents with the browser.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    🌐 Browsernode is the easiest way to connect your AI agents with the browser. It offers a specialized, high-level API designed specifically for LLM-powered automation, abstracting away the complexities of generic browser control tools like Playwright.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled '## Why Browsernode for AI Agents?' or '## Comparison with Generic Browser Automation' that explicitly outlines how Browsernode simplifies tasks for AI agents compared to using Playwright or Puppeteer directly.
  • lowtopics#3
    Refine and expand repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, browsernode, javascript, llm, playwright, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add 'llm-agents', 'agent-automation', 'web-automation-for-ai', 'headless-browser-for-ai' to the existing topics.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface leoning60/browsernode
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  2. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  3. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 1×
  4. browserless/browserless · recommended 1×
  5. robocorp/rpaframework · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enable my AI agent to interact with websites and automate online tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    3. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    4. Browserless (browserless/browserless)
    5. Robocorp (robocorp/rpaframework)
    6. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup4)
    7. Requests-HTML (psf/requests-html)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named leoning60/browsernode. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What JavaScript tools help LLM-powered agents automate complex browser interactions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. Cypress
    5. TestCafe
    6. WebDriverIO

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named leoning60/browsernode. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of leoning60/browsernode?
    pass
    AI did not name leoning60/browsernode — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts leoning60/browsernode in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named leoning60/browsernode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo leoning60/browsernode solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named leoning60/browsernode explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of leoning60/browsernode. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/leoning60/browsernode.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/leoning60/browsernode)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/leoning60/browsernode"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/leoning60/browsernode.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

leoning60/browsernode — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite