RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

deusyu/harness-engineering

Default branch main · commit be38af22 · scanned 5/20/2026, 9:48:40 AM

GitHub: 2,901 stars · 268 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface deusyu/harness-engineering, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, generative-ai, ai-engineering, agent-orchestration, prompt-engineering, ai-paradigm, learning-guide
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a clarifying sentence to the README's introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > 一个从概念理解到独立实践的 Harness Engineering 深度学习档案
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > 一个从概念理解到独立实践的 Harness Engineering 深度学习档案。**请注意，本仓库探讨的是由 OpenAI 提出的工程范式，与名为“Harness.io”的 CI/CD 平台无任何关联。**
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A URL to a dedicated project page, blog post, or documentation site for Harness Engineering (e.g., a GitHub Pages site if applicable).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface deusyu/harness-engineering
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Stable Baselines3
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Stable Baselines3 · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API (GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo) · recommended 1×
  3. Anthropic Claude (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku) · recommended 1×
  4. Google Gemini (Pro, Ultra) · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can engineers transition from writing code to guiding AI agent behavior?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API (GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo)
    2. Anthropic Claude (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku)
    3. Google Gemini (Pro, Ultra)
    4. LangChain
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. OpenAI Gym / Gymnasium
    7. Stable Baselines3
    8. Unity ML-Agents
    9. Ray RLib
    10. AutoGPT / BabyAGI
    11. CrewAI
    12. Microsoft AutoGen

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named deusyu/harness-engineering. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What strategies exist for defining precise constraints and feedback loops for AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TLA+
    2. Promela
    3. Spin
    4. Coq
    5. Isabelle
    6. HOL
    7. OpenAI Gym
    8. Farama Gymnasium
    9. Stable Baselines3
    10. PyTorch
    11. DeepMind's Safety Gym
    12. Drools
    13. JBoss Rules
    14. CLIPS
    15. Amazon Mechanical Turk
    16. Labelbox
    17. Scale AI
    18. React
    19. Angular
    20. IBM Adversarial Robustness Toolbox
    21. CleverHans
    22. LIME
    23. SHAP
    24. InterpretML

    AI recommended 24 alternatives but never named deusyu/harness-engineering. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of deusyu/harness-engineering?
    pass
    AI did not name deusyu/harness-engineering — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts deusyu/harness-engineering in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named deusyu/harness-engineering explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo deusyu/harness-engineering solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named deusyu/harness-engineering explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of deusyu/harness-engineering. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/deusyu/harness-engineering.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/deusyu/harness-engineering)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/deusyu/harness-engineering"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/deusyu/harness-engineering.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

deusyu/harness-engineering — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite