RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ContextualAI/HALOs

Default branch main · commit 48319886 · scanned 6/11/2026, 9:48:28 PM

GitHub: 906 stars · 52 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ContextualAI/HALOs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to emphasize "preference-based LLM alignment loss functions"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repo allows you to align LLMs with various methods, such as DPO, KTO, and an offline version of PPO.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This library provides extensible implementations of **preference-based loss functions** (like DPO, KTO, PPO, ORPO) for **aligning Large Language Models** with human feedback and desired behaviors.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics with more specific terms for LLM alignment and fine-tuning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    alignment, dpo, halos, kto, ppo, rlhf
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    alignment, dpo, halos, kto, ppo, rlhf, llm-alignment, fine-tuning, preference-learning, reinforcement-learning, machine-learning, deep-learning
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a dedicated "Comparison" section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why HALOs? (Comparison to Alternatives)
    
    Compared to alternatives like TRL or Axlotl, HALOs sacrifices some functionality for:
    - **Modularity**: Dataloading, training, and sampling are all separate components.
    - **Extensibility**: You can quickly write your own dataloader or implement a new alignment loss with ease.
    - **Simplicity**: The repository is intentionally kept small and focused, making it easy to understand and hack on.
    This design philosophy makes HALOs ideal for researchers and developers who need a flexible and transparent framework for experimenting with novel LLM alignment loss functions.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ContextualAI/HALOs
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
huggingface/trl
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. huggingface/trl · recommended 2×
  2. microsoft/DeepSpeed · recommended 2×
  3. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  4. huggingface/peft · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to fine-tune large language models using human feedback for better alignment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    2. PEFT (huggingface/peft)
    3. TRL (huggingface/trl)
    4. OpenAI API
    5. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    6. RLlib (ray-project/ray)
    7. PyTorch Lightning (Lightning-AI/lightning)
    8. PyTorch Ignite (pytorch/ignite)
    9. Weights & Biases (wandb/wandb)
    10. Label Studio (heartexlabs/label-studio)
    11. Argilla (argilla-io/argilla)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named ContextualAI/HALOs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a modular library to implement custom preference-based training for LLMs.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. trl (huggingface/trl)
    2. DeepSpeed-Chat (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    3. RLHF-Blender (stanford-futuredata/RLHF-Blender)
    4. OpenRLHF (OpenRLHF/OpenRLHF)
    5. PyTorch-RLHF

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ContextualAI/HALOs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ContextualAI/HALOs?
    pass
    AI named ContextualAI/HALOs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ContextualAI/HALOs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ContextualAI/HALOs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ContextualAI/HALOs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ContextualAI/HALOs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ContextualAI/HALOs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ContextualAI/HALOs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ContextualAI/HALOs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ContextualAI/HALOs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ContextualAI/HALOs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ContextualAI/HALOs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite