RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

adriannovegil/awesome-observability

Default branch master · commit 277b043b · scanned 6/2/2026, 7:42:43 PM

GitHub: 636 stars · 120 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface adriannovegil/awesome-observability, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Clarify the repository description to specify it's a list of resources

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Awesome observability page
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A curated awesome list of resources, tools, and best practices for system observability, covering logs, metrics, and traces.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/adriannovegil/awesome-observability
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific content keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    awesome, awesome-list, observability
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome, awesome-list, observability, logging, metrics, tracing, sre, devops, monitoring, best-practices, tools

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface adriannovegil/awesome-observability
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Datadog
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Datadog · recommended 1×
  2. New Relic · recommended 1×
  3. Dynatrace · recommended 1×
  4. Grafana Labs · recommended 1×
  5. grafana/grafana · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of tools and best practices for system observability?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Datadog
    2. New Relic
    3. Dynatrace
    4. Grafana Labs
    5. Grafana (grafana/grafana)
    6. Prometheus (prometheus/prometheus)
    7. Loki (grafana/loki)
    8. Tempo (grafana/tempo)
    9. Elastic Stack
    10. Elasticsearch (elastic/elasticsearch)
    11. Kibana (elastic/kibana)
    12. Beats (elastic/beats)
    13. Logstash (elastic/logstash)
    14. Jaeger (jaegertracing/jaeger)
    15. Zipkin (openzipkin/zipkin)
    16. The OpenTelemetry Project
    17. CNCF (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) Observability Landscape
    18. Google's SRE Book
    19. Distributed Systems Observability by Cindy Sridharan

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named adriannovegil/awesome-observability. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the essential tools and techniques for implementing logs, metrics, and traces?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elasticsearch
    2. Kibana
    3. Beats
    4. Logstash
    5. Splunk
    6. Grafana Loki
    7. Datadog Logs
    8. Fluentd
    9. Fluent Bit
    10. Prometheus
    11. Grafana
    12. Datadog Metrics
    13. InfluxDB
    14. New Relic Metrics
    15. OpenTelemetry
    16. Jaeger
    17. Zipkin
    18. Datadog APM
    19. New Relic APM

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named adriannovegil/awesome-observability. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of adriannovegil/awesome-observability?
    pass
    AI did not name adriannovegil/awesome-observability — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts adriannovegil/awesome-observability in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named adriannovegil/awesome-observability explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo adriannovegil/awesome-observability solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name adriannovegil/awesome-observability — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of adriannovegil/awesome-observability. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/adriannovegil/awesome-observability.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/adriannovegil/awesome-observability)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/adriannovegil/awesome-observability"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/adriannovegil/awesome-observability.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

adriannovegil/awesome-observability — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite