RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

crynta/terax-ai

Default branch main · commit d77476e7 · scanned 6/24/2026, 9:21:49 PM

GitHub: 7,332 stars · 795 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface crynta/terax-ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README opening to clarify category and tech stack

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1>Terax</h1>

  <p><strong>Lightweight Terminal-first AI-native dev workspace.</strong></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1>Terax</h1>

  <p><strong>Lightweight Terminal-first AI-native dev workspace.</strong></p>

  <p>Built on Tauri 2, Rust, and React 19, Terax is a cross-platform development environment (ADE) for developers seeking an integrated terminal, code editor, and AI agent capabilities.</p>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific development environment topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, code-editor, linux, macos, reactjs, rust, tauri, terminal, windows, xterm-js
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, code-editor, development-environment, dev-tools, ide, linux, macos, reactjs, rust, tauri, terminal, windows, xterm-js
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'Why Terax?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Why Terax? (Compared to VS Code, Cursor, or Warp)' or similar, detailing its unique value proposition (e.g., lightweight, terminal-first, native PTY, specific AI integration, no telemetry/account) and explicitly mentioning key competitors.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface crynta/terax-ai
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Visual Studio Code
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Visual Studio Code · recommended 2×
  2. Cursor · recommended 1×
  3. continue-team/continue · recommended 1×
  4. withfig/fig · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some lightweight AI-powered terminal development environments for coding assistance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. Continue (continue-team/continue)
    3. Fig AI (withfig/fig)
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. ShellGPT (theres-a-bot-for-that/sgpt)
    6. Aider (paul-gauthier/aider)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named crynta/terax-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a fast, cross-platform terminal with integrated code editing and AI agent capabilities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Warp
    2. iTerm2
    3. Visual Studio Code
    4. Kitty
    5. Neovim
    6. Alacritty
    7. Helix
    8. Hyper
    9. Visual Studio Code
    10. Termius

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named crynta/terax-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of crynta/terax-ai?
    pass
    AI did not name crynta/terax-ai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts crynta/terax-ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named crynta/terax-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo crynta/terax-ai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named crynta/terax-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of crynta/terax-ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/crynta/terax-ai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/crynta/terax-ai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/crynta/terax-ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/crynta/terax-ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

crynta/terax-ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite