RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher

Default branch master · commit 09d61df7 · scanned 5/18/2026, 4:17:30 AM

GitHub: 1,149 stars · 61 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to highlight unique archiving and analysis

    Why:

    CURRENT
    该项目用于获取、处理、分析和可视化哔哩哔哩用户的观看历史数据。它提供了完整的数据处理流程,从数据获取到可视化展示,并支持自动化运行和邮件通知。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    BilibiliHistoryFetcher 是一款专为哔哩哔哩用户设计的综合工具,旨在突破官方1000条观看历史限制,全面获取、处理、分析和可视化您的个人观看历史数据。它不仅能下载视频、动态和收藏夹,还能找回屏幕图片,并生成详细的年度总结,支持自动化任务,提供完整的数据处理与分析流程。
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    bilibili
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    bilibili, bilibili-history, bilibili-archive, data-analysis, video-downloader, content-scraper, automation, personal-data
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine description to highlight the 1000-item history limit

    Why:

    CURRENT
    获取b站历史记录,一键下载用户所有的视频,动态,收藏夹,找回14天内b站在屏幕上显示过的图片,生成详细的年度总结,自动化任务,下面链接是对应前端
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    突破B站1000条历史记录限制,全面获取、下载用户所有视频、动态、收藏夹,找回14天内屏幕图片,生成年度总结,并支持自动化任务。配套前端链接在主页。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
You-Get
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. You-Get · recommended 2×
  2. yt-dlp · recommended 2×
  3. Bilibili-History-Exporter · recommended 1×
  4. Bilibili Helper · recommended 1×
  5. Bilibili Evolved · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to archive my Bilibili watch history and download all my uploaded videos?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Bilibili-History-Exporter
    2. Bilibili Helper
    3. Bilibili Evolved
    4. You-Get
    5. yt-dlp
    6. youtube-dl
    7. Bilibili-dl
    8. Video DownloadHelper

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to analyze Bilibili viewing data, recover images, and automate content downloads?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. You-Get
    2. yt-dlp
    3. BiliBili-Toolkit
    4. Python
    5. requests
    6. BeautifulSoup
    7. lxml
    8. Scrapy
    9. Jupyter Notebooks
    10. JupyterLab
    11. pandas
    12. matplotlib
    13. seaborn
    14. Pillow
    15. FFmpeg

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher?
    pass
    AI did not name LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

LifeArchiveProject/BilibiliHistoryFetcher — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite