RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant

Default branch main · commit 5fbf2459 · scanned 6/6/2026, 12:08:14 PM

GitHub: 549 stars · 139 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening sentence to emphasize 'scanner' and 'personalized recommendations'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # GPT4 paper assistant: A daily ArXiv scanner

This repo implements a very simple daily scanner for Arxiv that uses GPT4 and author matches to find papers you might find interesting.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # GPT4 ArXiv Scanner: Personalized Daily Paper Recommendations

Automate your daily ArXiv paper discovery with this GPT4-powered scanner, delivering personalized recommendations directly to you via GitHub Pages or Slack.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    arxiv, gpt, research
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    arxiv, gpt, research, paper-recommendations, daily-digest, automation, github-actions, slack-bot
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison with Alternatives

While tools like Arxiv Sanity Preserver offer daily arXiv digests, and platforms like Semantic Scholar provide broad discovery, `gpt_paper_assistant` uniquely combines:

*   **Personalized Filtering:** Leverages GPT4 and author matching for highly relevant paper selection.
*   **Automated Delivery:** Runs daily via GitHub Actions, delivering updates to a static GitHub Pages site or Slack.
*   **Self-Hostable & Open-Source:** Provides full control over your data and customization, unlike many proprietary platforms.
*   **Cost-Effective:** Designed for minimal operational cost, as demonstrated by its low ArXiv processing expenses.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Connected Papers
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Connected Papers · recommended 2×
  2. Paper Digest · recommended 2×
  3. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  4. karpathy/arxiv-sanity-preserver · recommended 1×
  5. ResearchGate · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate daily ArXiv paper scanning and get personalized recommendations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Connected Papers
    2. Arxiv Sanity Preserver (karpathy/arxiv-sanity-preserver)
    3. Paper Digest
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. ResearchGate
    6. Feedly
    7. Inoreader
    8. DeepDyve

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools use AI to summarize new research papers and deliver them?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Semantic Scholar
    3. ResearchRabbit
    4. Connected Papers
    5. Scite.ai
    6. Paper Digest
    7. ChatGPT
    8. AskYourPDF
    9. ScholarAI

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant?
    pass
    AI named tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tatsu-lab/gpt_paper_assistant — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite