RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

onmax/nuxt-skills

Default branch main · commit 31107458 · scanned 6/13/2026, 3:58:00 AM

GitHub: 682 stars · 32 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface onmax/nuxt-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent-skills, nuxt, vue, coding-assistant, llm-tools, generative-ai, developer-tools, nuxt-modules
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumreadme#3
    Reposition README opening to emphasize AI agent integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README structure places the 'Works with Claude Code, Cursor...' line after the installation instructions.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the line 'Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Antigravity, Roo Code, and more.' to immediately below the main description `<p align="center">Vue, Nuxt, and NuxtHub skills for AI coding assistants.</p>` to clearly signal the target audience and purpose upfront.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface onmax/nuxt-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Vue.js
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Vue.js · recommended 1×
  2. Nuxt.js · recommended 1×
  3. Vuetify · recommended 1×
  4. Element Plus · recommended 1×
  5. Quasar Framework · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I improve my AI coding assistant's understanding of Vue and Nuxt projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Vue.js
    2. Nuxt.js
    3. Vuetify
    4. Element Plus
    5. Quasar Framework
    6. PrimeVue
    7. RealWorld Vue.js example
    8. Nuxt Content
    9. Vitesse
    10. Vue.js Documentation
    11. Nuxt.js Documentation
    12. Vue Router Documentation
    13. Vuex Documentation
    14. Pinia Documentation
    15. Vue Language Server (VLS)
    16. Volar (Vue Language Tools)

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named onmax/nuxt-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools integrate AI agent skills for building web applications with Nuxt.js?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain.js
    2. OpenAI API
    3. Hugging Face Transformers.js
    4. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    5. Microsoft Azure AI Services
    6. Azure OpenAI Service
    7. Azure Bot Service
    8. Replicate

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named onmax/nuxt-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of onmax/nuxt-skills?
    pass
    AI named onmax/nuxt-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts onmax/nuxt-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named onmax/nuxt-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo onmax/nuxt-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named onmax/nuxt-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of onmax/nuxt-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/onmax/nuxt-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/onmax/nuxt-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/onmax/nuxt-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/onmax/nuxt-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

onmax/nuxt-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite