RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher

Default branch main · commit 2ef7c14e · scanned 6/12/2026, 2:47:53 AM

GitHub: 504 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README introduction to emphasize 'open-source framework'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Welcome to OpenResearcher, an advanced Scientific Research Assistant designed to provide a helpful answer to a research query. With access to the arXiv corpus, OpenResearcher can provide the latest scientific insights. Explore the frontiers of science with OpenResearcher—where answers await.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Welcome to OpenResearcher, an advanced **open-source** Scientific Research Assistant designed to provide helpful answers to research queries. This project offers a powerful **framework** for building and deploying AI-powered research tools, leveraging the arXiv corpus for the latest scientific insights. Explore the frontiers of science with OpenResearcher—where answers await.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Link to the EMNLP Demo Track 2024 paper as the project homepage, or a dedicated project website if available.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  3. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  4. Humata AI · recommended 2×
  5. ResearchRabbit · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools can help me answer specific questions from research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Semantic Scholar
    3. Scite.ai
    4. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    5. Perplexity AI
    6. Humata AI
    7. ResearchRabbit

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an intelligent assistant to analyze and summarize scientific literature from arXiv.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Semantic Scholar
    3. ChatGPT
    4. ScholarAI
    5. AskYourPDF
    6. WebPilot
    7. Scite.ai
    8. ResearchRabbit
    9. Connected Papers
    10. Humata AI

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher?
    pass
    AI named GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite