RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wangdongdut/PaperWriting

Default branch master · commit d73ba996 · scanned 6/10/2026, 1:28:23 AM

GitHub: 681 stars · 128 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wangdongdut/PaperWriting, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    本页为DUT-ICE《深度学习》《深度学习与算法设计》《科技论文写作》等课程教学收集,教学/科研目的可随意转载,水平有限,不足之处见谅.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository serves as a comprehensive collection of resources, guidelines, and templates for academic paper writing, research, and presentations, specifically curated for courses like Deep Learning and Scientific Paper Writing at DUT-ICE. It aims to support students and researchers in effectively navigating the academic publication process.
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise English description for the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive collection of resources, guidelines, and templates for academic paper writing, research, and presentations, primarily for students and researchers in deep learning and related fields.
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) that best suits the project's intent.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wangdongdut/PaperWriting
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Purdue OWL
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Purdue OWL · recommended 1×
  2. The Craft of Research · recommended 1×
  3. They Say / I Say · recommended 1×
  4. University Writing Center Websites · recommended 1×
  5. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find comprehensive resources and guidelines for writing academic research papers effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Purdue OWL
    2. The Craft of Research
    3. They Say / I Say
    4. University Writing Center Websites
    5. Google Scholar
    6. Zotero
    7. Mendeley
    8. EndNote

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named wangdongdut/PaperWriting. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best practices for preparing conference submissions, including rebuttal and presentation tips?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly
    2. ProWritingAid
    3. LaTeX
    4. IEEEtran
    5. ACM SIGCHI
    6. Springer LNCS
    7. Microsoft Word
    8. Microsoft PowerPoint
    9. Google Slides
    10. Apple Keynote
    11. LaTeX Beamer
    12. Adobe Illustrator
    13. LaTeX Beamerposter

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named wangdongdut/PaperWriting. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wangdongdut/PaperWriting?
    pass
    AI named wangdongdut/PaperWriting explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wangdongdut/PaperWriting in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wangdongdut/PaperWriting explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wangdongdut/PaperWriting solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name wangdongdut/PaperWriting — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wangdongdut/PaperWriting. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wangdongdut/PaperWriting.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wangdongdut/PaperWriting)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wangdongdut/PaperWriting"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wangdongdut/PaperWriting.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wangdongdut/PaperWriting — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite